Showing posts with label Canada. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Canada. Show all posts

Tuesday, 27 June 2017

Favouritism - but why?

This week the Muslim world will be celebrating Eid al-Fitris which marks the end of the month long fasting of Ramadan. It is a special Muslim celebration. You can hear or see on all types of media this week, from TV commentators to political leaders to journalists and they all seem to have one thing in common; They are saying, “Eid Mubarak” which means nothing more than Happy Eid, but is Arabic.  I am puzzled as to why we seem to be brown-nosing to our Muslim neighbours for Eid. Do they hold something that we want, are we afraid to offend them? This is bending over — why in Arabic?


Arabic and Hebrew both belong to the Semitic language family making them similar languages. The structure, pronunciations and words resemble one another. Even the basic greetings are remarkably similar,
  • 'Assalamualaikum' Muslim greeting generally means 'peace be unto you'.
  • 'Shalom aleikhem' Hebrew greeting meaning 'peace be upon you'.

But when it comes to Jewish celebrations, we all say 'happy hanauka' and think nothing of it. I can't recall anytime hearing, "Pesach Sameach" (PAY-sock sah-MEY-akh) to wish them a happy Passover. In fact, unlike the Muslim greeting above, I had to look up this Jewish greeting. Are we only playing favourites?

I am not Islamophobic, but the obsequious greeting used by non-muslims should stop. It is just a mannered display conjured up by the social elite.  I wish we would stop pretending and simply wish them a good and happy Eid.

Friday, 11 November 2016

Does any one know where the love of God goes when the waves turn the minutes to hours?


According to a legend of the Chippewa tribe, the lake they once called Gitche Gumee "never gives up her dead." Thus began the Newsweek article in the issue of November 24, 1975.

On November 10, 1975, an ore carrier —the Edmund Fitzgerald— sank in Lake Superior during a November storm, taking the lives of all 29 crew members. Later that month, Gordon Lightfoot, inspired by that article in Newsweek Magazine, took the dry journalistic material and wrote what is probably his most famous and haunting song: 


Wreck Of The Edmund Fitzgerald.

The legend lives on from the Chippewa on down
of the big lake they called "Gitche Gumee."
The lake, it is said, never gives up her dead
when the skies of November turn gloomy.
With a load of iron ore twenty-six thousand tons more
than the Edmund Fitzgerald weighed empty,
that good ship and true was a bone to be chewed
when the "Gales of November" came early. 

The ship was the pride of the American side
coming back from some mill in Wisconsin.
As the big freighters go, it was bigger than most
with a crew and good captain well seasoned,
concluding some terms with a couple of steel firms
when they left fully loaded for Cleveland.
And later that night when the ship's bell rang,
could it be the north wind they'd been feelin'?

The wind in the wires made a tattle-tale sound
and a wave broke over the railing.
And ev'ry man knew, as the captain did too
'twas the witch of November come stealin'.
The dawn came late and the breakfast had to wait
when the Gales of November came slashin'.
When afternoon came it was freezin' rain
in the face of a hurricane west wind.

When suppertime came the old cook came on deck
Sayin' "Fellas, it's too rough t'feed ya."
At seven P.M. a main hatchway caved in; he said,
"Fellas, it's bin good t'know ya!"
The captain wired in he had water comin' in
and the good ship and crew was in peril.
And later that night when 'is lights went outta sight
came the wreck of the Edmund Fitzgerald.

Does any one know where the love of God goes
when the waves turn the minutes to hours?
The searchers all say they'd have made Whitefish Bay
if they'd put fifteen more miles behind 'er.
They might have split up or they might have capsized;
they may have broke deep and took water.
And all that remains is the faces and the names
of the wives and the sons and the daughters.

Lake Huron rolls, Superior sings
in the rooms of her ice-water mansion.
Old Michigan steams like a young man's dreams;
the islands and bays are for sportsmen.
And farther below Lake Ontario
takes in what Lake Erie can send her,
And the iron boats go as the mariners all know
with the Gales of November remembered.

In a musty old hall in Detroit they prayed,
in the "Maritime Sailors' Cathedral."
The church bell chimed 'til it rang twenty-nine times
for each man on the Edmund Fitzgerald.
The legend lives on from the Chippewa on down
of the big lake they call "Gitche Gumee."
"Superior," they said, "never gives up her dead
when the gales of November come early!"

Below is a copy of the article.


Friday, 27 November 2015

Are we to Trust an Ally like Turkey

Russian SU-24

Turkey's Claim:A SU-24 jet was 19,000 feet high in Turkey’s airspace for 17 seconds and travelled 1.84 km across the southern tip.  

Facts
Generally in less tense times air incursions happen pretty regularly but generally you’d expect warning shots to be fired and attempts to force the intruder to leave or to land. Not was this case in Syria between Turkey and Russia.

The Turks shot down a Russian Su-24 jet and did so within 17 seconds – with Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoğlu revealing that he personally gave the order to down the Russian Su-24 fighter jet– suggesting very strongly they were waiting for a Russian plane to come into or close enough to Turkish airspace with the aim of delivering a rather pyrotechnic message.

This is a highly ambiguous allegation and much media is neglecting to consider some of the mathematical facts.

The Su-24's max speed is 1320 km/hour (at sea level) and can be greater at a higher altitude  i.e. 19,000 feet per Turkey's letter to the UN, so it would mean that the SU-24 would have been in an out (if it is was) of Turkish airspace (1.84 km width) in 5 seconds! Whereas the Turks claim it was in for 17 seconds.



 This means that the supersonic jet on a mission of war would have been flying at a much less stable or controllable 390 km/hour speed. Highly impossible.

Now in context, Ankara is fiercly anti-Assad and in addition to being generally displeased with Russia's efforts to support the regime, just four days ago, Turkey summoned Russian ambassador Andrey Karlov over the alleged bombing of Turkish villages near the border. Ankara warned bombing villages populated by the Turkmen minority in Syria could lead to 'serious consequences.'

Of course Russia wasn't just bombing Turkish civilians for the sheer hell of it. It's likely Moscow was targeting the very same FSA-affiliated Alwiya al-Ashar militiamen who shot and killed the parachuting Russian pilot earlier that day.

In short, it looks like Ankara saw an opportunity to shoot down a Russian jet in retaliation for strikes on Turkish rebel fighters who are operating alongside anti-Assad forces. Erdogan is essentially gambling that Russia will not retaliate militarily against Turkey because doing so would open the door for a direct confrontation with NATO.



I hope our Prime Minister gets all the facts before jumping in with NATO. Treaty or not.





Wednesday, 28 October 2015

Dichotomy of Canada's right to free expression (Muslim or First Nation)

I quite regularly have my opinions as do many other of my fellow Canadians, but I am speechless in this situation. Canada has it's Charter of Rights and Freedoms and within it there is a section granting free expression. Within limits - which has come to include hate speech not being tolerated.

Back in February of this year, the French magazine Charlie Hebdo printed some sarcastic caricatures of the Muslim prophet Muhammed. It caused a riot and some deaths in France because of it.

Back here in Canada, Angus Reid conducted a poll for the National Post; about the magazines right to publish the incendiary cartoons. That poll indicated the vast majority of Canadians supported Charlie Hebdo’s right to publish cartoons of the Prophet Muhammed and most prioritised freedom of speech over fear of offending religious sensibilities by a clear 70 per cent.

Now here is the dichotomy


This year also saw a bandwagon of out door concerts and festivals begin to ban the wearing of First Nations headdresses. On the website for Montreal’s Osheaga Music and Arts Festival, beneath the customary rules and regulations was a comprehensive list of items banned from the festival premises, including laser pointers, fireworks, drones and selfie sticks. This year the list — surprise surprise —  contained the addition: traditional First Nations headdresses.

The rule was clear and ironclad. Any attendee who showed up wearing a headdress would have it confiscated upon entry or be asked to leave and return without it.

The First Nations headdress was also much-discussed when a young white woman donned one at the Winnipeg Folk Festival.  A few surreptitious snapshots circulated on social media, arousing a maelstrom of outrage and indignation and within hours, the festival had issued a statement denouncing such gestures of cultural appropriation and insisted that the organisers consider banning headdresses from future events.

“this time of greater awareness”... respect First Nations culture.

The incident effected more substantive change elsewhere, as music festivals across Canada continued to speak out against appropriation and imposed hardline bans. The Edmonton Folk Festival revealed on Facebook that at “this time of greater awareness” it would like its attendees to respect First Nations cultures and to not wear any type of First Nations headdresses during the festival. The Calgary Folk Festival, following Winnipeg’s precedent, publicly implored its patrons to leave headdresses at home but would not officially forbid them.

So in a nutshell, Canada agrees with the public mocking of a religious leader in the name of free speech, and yet demonises free expression from a few young women for enjoying the aethestic beauty (not mocking, not desecrating) of a First Nations Headdress. Both situations concerning religious attitudes and yet both treated very differently.












Thursday, 1 October 2015

Hang 'em high or Disavow: the privilege to say, "I am Canadian"

Our Oath:

I swear (or affirm)
That I will be faithful
And bear true allegiance
To Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth the Second
Queen of Canada
Her Heirs and Successors
And that I will faithfully observe
The laws of Canada
And fulfil my duties as a Canadian citizen.

Disrespect to his country

The old ways:

"[Name], in a few short weeks it will be spring. The snows of winter will flow away, the ice will vanish, the air will become soft and balmy.The annual miracle of the years will awaken and come to pass. The rivulet will run its soaring course to the sea. The timid desert flowers will put fourth their tender shoots. The glorious valleys of this imperial domain will blossom as the rose. From every tree top, some wild songster will carol his mating song. Butterflies will sport in the sunshine.

But you will not be their to enjoy it, because I command the sheriff of the county to lead you away to some remote spot, swing you by the neck from a knotting bough of some sturdy oak and let you hang until dead.

And then [Name], I further command that such officers retire quickly from your dangling corpse, that vultures may descend from the heavens upon your filthy body until nothing is left but the bare, bleached bones of a cold-blooded, blood-thirsty, throat-cutting, murdering S.O.B." - Judge Roy Bean.

More civilised:

As pointed out in an interview by the National Post with Defence Minister Jason Kenney.
In addition to terrorism, the law applies to dual nationals convicted of treason and spying for foreign governments, as well as members of armed groups at war against Canada, such as those fighting with the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant.

“This is about respecting the value of Canadian citizenship,” Kenney said in an interview on the weekend.
 “If someone hates Canada so much that they’re prepared to demonstrate violent disloyalty to the country, they forfeit their citizenship. It’s a simple principle.”
He cited the case of former Montreal resident Sami Elabi, who posted a video online from Syria, where he was fighting with al-Qaida. It showed him burning his Canadian passport and then propping it against a wall and shooting it with an assault rifle.

“I think it’s bizarre in the extreme that he should be able to show up at a Canadian embassy … and that we should then be obliged to issue him a new passport and welcome him back to Canada. That’s the position of Mr. Trudeau and Mr. Mulcair. It is an insult to the integrity of Canadian citizenship.”
Do we really need to argue, that a dual citizen who commits Terrorism, Treason, Espionage, and Foreign Military engagement against our country deserves to be able to say "I am Canadian"?

Thursday, 10 September 2015

Mulcair: When push comes to shove what country would he choose?


Thomas Mulcair is a dual citizen. He has both Canadian and French citizenship. He has French because of his wife. He had the option and jumped through the bureaucratic hoops — for which France is famous — including one to five years of uninterrupted residency, signing a contract stating you will assimilate into French society, completing civics training with an understanding of France’s public services and completing French exams. Also, based on France’s Civil Code, future French citizens must sign a Charter of Rights and Responsibilities including an obligatory pledge of allegiance to France.

The NDP leader claims he sought this French citizenship so he and his family could travel together on French passports; But his wife is Canadian too, so what is wrong with a Canadian passport?

I would prefer that a leader of a party hold only Canadian citizenship...
His predecessor, Jack Layton previously scorned an ex-Liberal candidate Mr. Dion for having two citizenships having said,  “I would prefer that a leader of a party hold only Canadian citizenship, because one represents so many Canadians...it’s better to remain the citizen of one country.”

Mulcair says what's wrong with having two citizenships, a lot of people do? He simply does not understand the responsibilities of being the leader of a country. He still has the mind of an opposition leader and will not change.

As leader of a country your allegiance and for that matter, your loyalty, is to one and only one country. And that should be to Canada.

Friday, 24 July 2015

Is Canada too Multicultural to Appreciate OUR History?


I finished watching a fantastic television series the other day. It was called, "The Sons of Liberty".
From Sons of Liberty
It was a co UK-USA production about events leading up to the Revolutionary War and the signing of the USA declaration of independence in 1776.
Airing about a month before, I saw another series (Texas Rising) that was about the Texan struggle for their independence from Mexico in the post Alamo time frame of 1835–1836.
From Texas Rising
Both these shows were extremely well done. I am now glued to another series — yet to be finished — done by the BBC called Poldark. It's a story in the post US revolutionary time of the 1780s in Cornwall at the south of England. 
This series is more like a historical novel, but is very interesting to see the way of life back then and be entertained.

These three shows have character, depth and above all, their countries' life during the parts of their 18th century heritage. Both countries are prepared to enlighten and entertain us with that part of our ancestry. 
From Poldark
I respect Canada's multicultural ideals, but since much of our history is being neglected in schools, I am wondering if the CBC is forgetting where and how Canada got its start or just ignoring it because it is the in thing to do.

Is Canada too Multicultural to Appreciate OUR History? It is not. Our history is deep and deserves more than some small vignettes on the multi-cultural TV station..

CBC - give some thoughts to enlightening and entertaining us with some Canadian History, unless you consider our pride is not worth viewing.   

Wednesday, 1 July 2015

Canada Day - some of our history


Canada Day would not be the same if it were not for at least some recollections of our great country and what it took to build. So much is always said about our founding fathers and the actual act of confederation in 1867 but I have my favourite stories also, especially since I grew up not terribly far from where this battle took place.


A Discovery

Historians and chroniclers for nearly two centuries made no mention of this episode in the Iroquois wars of the 1660s. It was lost to time only that in the 19th century, a discovery by Dollier de Casson’s unveiled — in my mind — an incredible act of bravery and how much this land of ours meant to the new Europeans living here. That discovery was a manuscript of the Histoire du Montréal, which gave detailed accounts of the combat of May 1660 — otherwise known as, “the Battle of the Sault”.

Contact me by:

Name

Email *

Message *

Follow my Twitter

Translate

Printfriendly

Print Friendly and PDF